So why did Hollywood think it was a good idea to release 2 movies called "Runner" around the same time? Though the difference is one of them stars Jack Reacher and released to theaters, while the other stars probably the worst actress of a generation and released to Amazon Prime. In The Runner , Gal Gadot runs for her son's life when he is kidnapped by Damien Lewis. I have heard almost no good things about this movie aside from it being short. However I tried not to let that cloud my own judgment upon finally watching this. But unfortunately people are right, this is very bad. The problem is this movie tries way too hard to be intense when it's mostly just running and talking. And whenever it actually did get intense it was either briefly or extremely over-the-top. Pretty much everything was poorly executed. Mainly the plot twist, which I was aware of before hand due to other reviews. Not only was it obviously impossible and unrealistic for the protagonist to pull of...
So I ended up seeing this with my dad last Sunday after he expressed also having interest in this I think about 2 weeks prior. My favorite Spider-Man Andrew Garfield stars as a humble ploughman (later identified as Robin Hood) who kick starts a rebellion known as the Peasants Revolt across the nation. The movie was decent. I wasn't completely blown away, but there were some moments of truth in the movie that I agreed with. The film did deliver on the action, which was brutal but memorable, and the performances were relatively solid (Garfield couldn't do a bad performance even if he tried). There was a lot of shaky cam, so I will admit there were times where I didn't really understand what was going on due to all the shakiness. And I do understand if viewers were caught off-guard with the sudden connection to Robin Hood as it did feel a little bit like it came out of nowhere. But overall, I'm good with the film. Thanks For Reading Facebook-https://www.facebook.com/naom...